Country code:
Flag:

Ownership rules:
Default (statutory) regime for the ownership | Patents: inventor; Copyright: author |
---|---|
Default (statutory) regime for employee’s creations | Patents: Employer / Copyright: Employer if the work was made in course of employment or similar relationships, and the author was hired to create such works. |
Ownership of research results in publicly sponsored research | Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act No. 51 of 2008 Section 4: Subject to Section 15(2) (below), Intellectual property emanating from publicly financed research and development shall be owned by the recipient. If recipient prefers not to retain ownership in its intellectual property or not to obtain statutory protection, NIPMO may acquire ownership in such intellectual property and obtain statutory protection. If NIPMO decides not to acquire ownership, the creator of such intellectual property will be entitled to acquire ownership in intellectual property and to obtain statutory protection. Section 15(2): Any private entity or organisation may become a co-owner of the intellectual property emanating from publicly financed research and development undertaken at an institution if: - there has been a contribution of resources, which may include relevant background intellectual property by the private entity or organisation; - there is joint intellectual property creatorship; - appropriate arrangements are made for benefit-sharing for intellectual property creators at the institution; and - the institution and the private entity or organisation conclude an agreement for the commercialisation of the intellectual property. |
Specific ownership rules for public HEIs/research organisations and possibility to modify it contractually | HEI shall be the owner of intellectual property |
Specific ownership regime for students/ visiting researchers/doctoral students and possibility to modify it contractually | HEI shall be the owner of intellectual property |
Related law (name & link) |
Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act No. 51 of 2008 |
Dissemination rules:
Limitations on publication | Should the University wish to use or publish results of its research in respect of the Research Project, it shall provide Client with a copy of the proposed manuscript or dissertation intended for use or publication. Client shall be given a period of 30 days after receipt to review the proposed manuscript provided the proposed manuscript does not contain any Confidential Information. In the case of a dissertation, Client shall be given a period of 45 days after receipt to review the proposed dissertation, provided the proposed dissertation does not contain any Confidential Information. Should the proposed manuscript or dissertation contain Confidential Information, Client shall be given a period of 90 days, after receipt, within which to review the proposed manuscript or dissertation and to notify The University should it believe that such manuscript or dissertation contains information which, if used or published, would result in Client suffering commercial prejudice. The University shall have the option of removing the prejudicial information and re-submitting the amended manuscript or dissertation to Client on the same conditions as aforesaid. Either Party shall be entitled to stipulate that any publication of the research be withheld from distribution to the public for a period not exceeding 12 months in order to allow for the prior securing of Intellectual Property Rights. |
---|---|
Specific rules regarding publication of scientific results financed by public bodies | Researchers are obliged to disclose and HEIs are obliged to patent prior to publications (IPR Act and NIPMO requirements) |
Non-disclosure clauses in research contracts | See above |
Specific incentives for innovation activities:
Related Law (name & Link) | Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act No. 51 of 2008 |
---|---|
Incentives provided by law for individual researchers | No |
Related Law (name & Link) | - |
Incentives provided by HEI for researcher | HEIs are entitled to provide incentives for researchers. In all such cases where the IPR Act applies the incentives are prescribed. Where a research sponsor funds the research outside the ambit of the IPR Act the HEI may prescribe its own incentives. |
Form of commercialisation:
Form of commercialisation | Requirements regarding form of contract | Limitations for HEIs | HEIs Unit responsible for commercialisation | Related law (name & link) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assignment of IPR to Client | Research contract in terms of which the research sponsor obtains the proprietary rights to IPR. | as provided in Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act | The Research Sponsor (client) | Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act No. 51 of 2008 |
Licence of IPR | Terms can be exclusive or non-exclusive. Territory may also be used to limit licensing terms. | as provided in Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act | Technology Transfer Office | Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act No. 51 of 2008 |
Spin out company | None | as provided in Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act | Technology Transfer Office | Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act No. 51 of 2008 |
Revenue sharing:
Remuneration/ Participation in revenues | Statutory rules regarding remuneration | Statutory rules regarding revenue sharing | Internal HEIs rules regarding revenue sharing | Related law (name & link) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patents and other IPRs | Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act prescibes minimum benefit sharing persentages | Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act prescibes minimum benefit sharing persentages | All HEIs in South Africa have Intellectual Property Policies that must comply with the requirments of NIPMO. NIPMO also has the power to instruct non-compliant universities to amend their resective IP Policies to reflect the minimum benefit sharing requirtments | Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act No. 51 of 2008 |
Copyrights | Section 21 and 22 of the Copyright Act provides for employees to enter into agreements with employers regarding copyright ownership | None | With the exception of software the HEIs does not lay claim to royalty revenues from copyrighted works |
Models of contracts used in R&D:
Type of contracts | Short description | Source (link) |
---|---|---|
EU-FP7 contracts | All South African institutions use the EU-FP7 set of contracts for collaboration | http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/funding/refe... |